this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2022
3 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32311 readers
889 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That has nothing to do with the recent escalation of military presence, which I know that you know, so why are you wasting both my time and yours?

[–] guojing@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You must be talking about these satellite pictures of Russian tanks being parked outside their permanent barracks. Really scary!

And which recent escalation do you mean exactly?

[–] abbenm@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There is a substantial new troop presence at a scale without recent precedent and you're just trying to change the subject. It has recently been reported as 190,000 troops. Literally none of the articles cited by you or your friend have those kinds of figures.

So to recap:

  • The Rostov base has nothing to do with anything
  • a news cycle about a picture has nothing to do with anything
  • The timeline of previous buildups have nothing to do with anything.

You're just cycling through stupid derails, one after another. Next you're probably going to post a news article about how a reporter said something wrong about Russia in 2017 and say "what about this?!?!" And that, too, will have nothing to do with anything.

You're continuing to waste my time and yours, which I'm guessing is the goal here.

[–] guojing@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Yes a lot has been reported, but actual proof is never given. Thats probably why you didnt bother linking any sources for your claims.