this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
644 points (92.9% liked)

News

23646 readers
4744 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

APNews.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have any sources of this?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This article says that Israel shut off the electricity, not bomb purely civilian targets.

Did I miss that in the source?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In 2014, during the Gaza War, the Gaza Power Plant was hit several times by Israeli shelling.

That would be civilian infrastructure.

[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In 2014, during the Gaza War

Yeah that was during a war, though. That's completely allowed in the playbook or are you going to say that literally anything Israel did in retaliation is a "civilian target". Because if that's the case, your definitions and understanding of this subject matter is biased and objectively wrong.

Also, by the same virtue, Palestine has attacked civilian targets as well. You either say both sides are causing this conflict or neither are. You can't always blame Israel when Palestine is doing the exact same thing.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You asked a question. I gave you the answer. You don’t like the answer and for some reason believe you have to defend your presumptions. You don’t. It’s okay to be wrong. That’s how we learn. Also, I like your name.

[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Aww sweaty you don't have to try so hard. It's okay, we've all looked dumb on the internet once or twice before 😂

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I admire your ability to admit you were wrong. It takes a mature person to admit that.

[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And you're downvoting my comments? 😂😂😂

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You called me sweaty. That was mean. I have a gland problem. 😭😭😭

[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol I can smell the anxiety sweat from here 😂

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Kythtrid@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Israel isnt retaliating to shit, they created this mess. the Palestinian militia groups locked in the open air prison of Gaza are the ones "retaliating".

You do know that 44% of the Gazan population is 14 or younger, right? Every shelling is killing kids, shutting off the electricity is killing kids. How many children do you have to shell in "self-defense"? Fuck off with that, Palestine is not doing "The exact same thing".

[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I recall a small little, tincy wincy attack from this terrorist group called "Hamas" that started this. Israel is no saint but Hamas, and Palestine supporting it, is 100% to blame for this. Sorry to remind you about that massacre.

[–] Kythtrid@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a take that ignores a full 100 years of history - including the displacement of the entire Palestinian arab population. "Israel is no saint" - they are literally colonists engaging in a genocide of the Palestinians.

[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By that logic, do all countries have a century long statute of limitations to engage in vengeful warfare because of "past conflicts". Would you justify the massacre of white people because of slavery? Or would you allow native Americans to kill thousands because their ancestors were pushed away from their "land"? You do realize that every single country has fought for its territory - no flag is without sin.

I'm sorry your side isn't willing to budge on this issue but you can't engage in this discourse without a nuanced understanding of real history and honest critical thinking. You're letting others tell you what to feel and look stupid for it.

[–] Kythtrid@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By that logic, do all countries have a century long statute of limitations to engage in vengeful warfare because of "past conflicts". Would you justify the massacre of white people because of slavery

This is a false equivalency, Israel is actively engaging in settler-colonialism and genocide. These people who have been expelled from their home 76 years ago are actively suffering for it, it's a living memory. Are you comfortable letting "your side" use Hamas's attack on Israel as a justification to engage in ethnic cleansing ?

Or would you allow native Americans to kill thousands because their ancestors were pushed away from their "land"?

I would actually support giving land back to native Americans in the US/canada. If they started attacking white people to take land back, i wouldn't use that as an excuse to decimate their population. It's possible to have a nuanced understanding of a situation, and still not side with genocide.

You do realize that every single country has fought for its territory - no flag is without sin.

And it's possible to recognize and be critical of that, while also being critical of an ethnostate that is actively engaging in the decimation of the Palestinians that used to live there.

I'm sorry your side isn't willing to budge on this issue but you can't engage in this discourse without a nuanced understanding of real history and honest critical thinking. You're letting others tell you what to feel and look stupid for it.

Seriously? It sounds like you're projecting an idea of "my side" onto me. Im sorry you aren't able to engage in nuanced discourse without projecting and attacking my intelligence.

[–] DaBabyAteMaDingo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a false equivalency, Israel is actively engaging in settler-colonialism and genocide. These people who have been expelled from their home 76 years ago are actively suffering for it, it's a living memory. Are you comfortable letting "your side" use Hamas's attack on Israel as a justification to engage in ethnic cleansing ?

When you say "actively engaging in genocide", are you referring to the recent attacks this month or in the past? Palestine has not made it secret that they want to wipe Israelis from the face of this earth. I genuinely don't understand your point here.

I would actually support giving land back to native Americans in the US/canada. If they started attacking white people to take land back, i wouldn't use that as an excuse to decimate their population. It's possible to have a nuanced understanding of a situation, and still not side with genocide.

At least you're consistently dumb. I just wish that blissful dumbness would bleed over into defending Israel from time to time.

And it's possible to recognize and be critical of that, while also being critical of an ethnostate that is actively engaging in the decimation of the Palestinians that used to live there.

Again, Palestine wants to wipe Israel off the face of this earth. Why is it okay for Palestine to do it and not Israel? I find it fascinating that you give so much leeway to one country, but not another even though you're using the same parameters to judge one and justify the other.

Seriously? It sounds like you're projecting an idea of "my side" onto me. Im sorry you aren't able to engage in nuanced discourse without projecting and attacking my intelligence.

I don't think you're just stupid. I think you're an actual horrible person to dismiss an entire country and its people because somebody told you one side is good and one side is bad.

[–] Kythtrid@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Geez, can you have a conversation without engaging in ad-hominem attacks? You've really thrown civilty out the window here.

Again, Palestine wants to wipe Israel off the face of this earth. Why is it okay for Palestine to do it and not Israel?

Of course Palestine wants to wipe out Israel, they fucked the Palestinians 10 times sideways and displaced the whole population. But does anyone seriously think Palestine is capable of wiping out israel? I dont think either is OK, but how much suffering can you lay on a whole population before retaliation is justified? Why shouldn't the Palestinians hate Israel when it's creation led to all of them losing their homes?

At least you're consistently dumb. I just wish that blissful dumbness would bleed over into defending Israel from time to time.

Damn, fuck off asshole. You have no idea how much leeway I've given Israel until now. I've defended Israel, and I just can't anymore. Israel created a mess, and their only solution is to annihilate the people they displaced?

I don't think you're just stupid. I think you're an actual horrible person to dismiss an entire country and its people because somebody told you one side is good and one side is bad.

I started looking into the history of the situation and my opinion changed. I'm not dismissing the Israeli people, but I'm not going to support their retalliation either. I'm a horrible person for that? Wouldn't that make you a horrible person for supporting Israel's genocide of Palestinians? Nobody "told me what to think" you smug prick, can you stop projecting for one conversation?