this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
227 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37756 readers
672 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] noodlejetski@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

apparently some Mastodon admins got contacted by Meta and met with them after signing an NDA. I'm quite surprised how many Masto admins want to "just wait and see, maybe it's not gonna be that bad".

[–] BlackCoffee@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Meta and met with them after signing an NDA"

This should tell quite enough.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? Have you never worked with any company anywhere?

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

lol, I had to sign nda just to do an interview.

[–] quantum_mechanic@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd guess they were made an offer they couldn't refuse, ie money.

[–] KarsicKarl@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm guessing you haven't been on the #Fediverse very long so not picked up on the ethos of most of the folk who run the various instances.
Most are very protective of what they have created as a community and are definitely not in it for the money. Some are vehemently anti-capitalist.

There are many ways to get rich. Running an instance is not one of them.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe we can counter offer an offer they couldn’t refuse, ie eat their donors.

[–] skogens_ro@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Who are these donors and what does "eating" them actually entail?

I'm surely misinterpreting you, because it sounds like you're suggesting murdering people over SoMe bullshit.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure parent is making a glib reference to the common "eat the rich" saying. It's meant to be a provocative way to illustrate a larger message of anti-capitalism and the immorality of extreme wealth disparity.

[–] skogens_ro@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Let's demonise a subset of the population and joke about murdering them just like my ideological comrades did in the 20th century! Look how provocative I'm being.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Defending billionaires is an even more ammoral act than making a joke you don't like, comrade.

[–] skogens_ro@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I dislike seeing radicals joke about murdering their enemies. It dehumanises them which helps extremism takes hold.

Of course that is the point of such jokes, but you shouldn't be surprised if people call you out on it.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, it absolutely is the point. I don't think billionaires should exist, full stop. They have already dehumanized everyone but themselves, so IMO turnaround is completely fair in this situation. Starting with a very extreme demand like "eat the rich" gives us lots of room to negotiate their surrender.

In general, I agree with you. But some cases are too important and cannot be reasoned with. As an otherwise avowed pacifist, I'd put "punch a Nazi in the face" on this list of acceptable moral hypocrisy, too.

[–] skogens_ro@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're kidding yourself if you think it's a negotiation tactic. When the revolution comes, such revisionism will get you executed by true believers.

But at least you're useful to them for the time being. Someone needs to radicalise the people who will carry out the purges.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What revolution are you talking about? Billionaires already run the world, so the only possible option is to reverse that. In which case my position seems like it would appeal very nicely to the new ruling power.

[–] StrawberryCake@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

SKill issue tbf, we should all unalive the rich

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Won't someone think of the poor billionaires!

[–] KarsicKarl@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I am a donor on various instances.
I'd take a dim view of being eaten.