The appendix was/is a repository for gut biome when humans getting diarrhea was as regular as Tuesdays. An occasional death from a burst appendix was the lesser evil

It was really important back then. But then we developed safer food/water practices and it was basically useless. But still bursting on occasion.

So there was a very slow march towards people just not having them. Over a long enough timeline that would have spread and the appendix would have gone the way of the human tail.

But now that we can remove them, there's no negative evolutionary pressure, and we're probably going to stay around .001% of people born without an appendix.

It's a great example of how medicine and science actively stalls evolution.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eyesight will get worse over time now, but people can see better than ever... it's a bizarre contradiction.

Until you consider medicine and technology to be part of the aggregate evolutionary progress. In which case, we're racing ahead!

I don't think we see a return to traditional evolutionary pressure unless we get truly isolated populations again, coupled with a major global disaster. That, or people living in space.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Until you consider medicine and technology to be part of the aggregate evolutionary progress

No, that stuff is memetic instead of genetic.

You can say it's human society evolving, but it's not humans evolving.

[–] getseclectic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I think there is a strong argument that we have been post human since we developed writing and that a 'person' encompasses more than just their meat sack. I was first introduced to this idea by the book Natural Born Cyborgs. You are taking a narrower view of the word evolution, but I'm not totally sure it's justified.