this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
121 points (83.8% liked)

Technology

59311 readers
4528 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
121
Toyota nears mass production of solid-state batteries (archive.ph)
submitted 1 year ago by bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not long at all, but the challenge isn't the same. Again demonstrating you don't understand the topic.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the people who do, are building pilot production lines. Why?

[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They aren't though. You can't tell the difference between PR, Marketing, and real life.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are though. Have you any idea of the capex involved in a 65,000 m2 facility?

In March 2022, Samsung SDI announced that it would set up a trial production line for manufacturing solid-state batteries in Yeongton-gu, a district in the South Korean city of Suwon. The production line, which is named the “S-line”, would take up an area of 65,000 square meters.

https://m.energytrend.com/news/20230710-32628.html

[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Notice how that article is from July, and they didn't report progress on such a line? Odd, no? Surely in four months the tense would have gone from "will" to "is", right? And yet...