Asklemmy

43971 readers

868 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

119

How to deal with Ancient aliens in the workplace? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SpaceAce@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Two of my coworkers frequently mention shows like "Encounters" or "Ancient apocalypse" or whatever. I'm not the best at debating or forming arguments against these though I do feel strongly that bold claims require better evidence than a blurry photo and an eyewitness account. How do you all go about this?

Today I clumsily stumbled through conversation and said "I'll need some evidence" and was hit with "there's plenty of evidence in the episode 'Lights over Fukushima'". I didn't have an answer because I haven't watched it. I'm 99% sure that if I watch it it's gonna be dramatized, designed to scare/freak you out a little and consist of eyewitness accounts and blurry photos set to eerie music. But I'm afraid I just sound like a haughty know-it-all if I do assert this before watching.

These are good people and I want to remain on good terms and not come across as a cynical asshole.

(Sorry if language is too formal or stilted. Not my native tongue)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why do they always think ancient humans were so stupid?

Because they (and by extension their audience) are not that bright.

If they cannot think of how it was done and they must be smart because they live with all this modern technology (which they didn't create and don't really understand) then there is no way for people in the past to have done it.

Therefore...aliens. Well, that is the modern thought. In the past it you just replace aliens with God or Gods or Demons etc.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah replacing "god" with "aliens" pretty much sums up the mentality here.

One that really gets me (and I can't think offhand of where exactly it is at), is an artificial cave network that appears to date back to the last big ice age, around 10,000 years ago. "But they didn't have anything other than stone tools, so it couldn't have been created by humans!" You're telling me that if the only thing you know about is stone, that you wouldn't have some understanding that some types of stone are harder than others? We're talking about people living in one place for millennia with nothing to do except go out hunting for food and sitting in the cave, and in all that time they couldn't have slowly cut out more caves to make their homes larger? Seems like such a simple idea to me, and yet it seems to go right over the heads of all these people discussing those caves. "Mommy I'm bored!" "Grab a rock and start grinding, dear."