this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
567 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59201 readers
4009 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nadella, Gates, and Ballmer have all admitted to Microsoft’s mobile mistakes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 131 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There’s nothing stopping Microsoft from coming out with a new phone line, other than poor management.

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Replace "new phone line" with pretty much anything 'positive' and it fits Microsoft.

Better OS? Nope! Shit management. Better productivity software? Nope! Shit management. Better cloud and virtualization platform? Nope! Shit management.

The first day I used Windows 8 RC, I was flabbergasted that anyone approved that dumpster fire for release. They've been trying to unfuck that ever since, and at dead snail's pace. Thanks, shit management! You're why I left systems administration to be a bad programmer!

[–] DinosaurSr@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you program in? Ive really enjoyed the new .NET ecosystem, but I'm sure it'll go to shit eventually just like the rest of their products...

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That's the irony! Mainly working in C# .NET (and some SSIS) and maintaining an unfair amount of legacy VB on ETL processes.

FWIW I was working in Java on the middle-end of Oracle for a few years before changing positions to where I am.

But at least I'm never on-call!

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For real. AOSP is open source, and Google is taking more things private. MS could start driving AOSP since FOSS projects go where the group contributing the most wants it to go.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That would force them to adopt different languages internally though. I don't know what they are doing these days, but something tells me it's not kotlin and jetpack.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What about Windows subsystem for Android?

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/android/wsa/

It even gives developer options where you can sideload unsigned apk files for developing your own.

I mean, they've at least made inroads with Android, it's not impossible to consider them making moves in the area.

It sure seems like they still do love their Embrace, Extend, Extinguish strategy.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

They’re already talking up .NET MAUI. Their cross-platform C# application UI.

I’m also not sure MS cares that much if that gets them in the game.

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago

I wish this can be true but that's bow how trillion dollar companies work. There's lot of redtape involved. Think of it as one drug dealer is not allowed to deal drugs on other dealers turf. But something tell me if we start praising elon , probably he'll take the bait and might drive aosp away from google but I also fear he might burn the whole thing down to the ground lol

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not that easy on the hardware side. Keep in mind that the way both Google and Microsoft previously entered this market was by buying an established manufacturer (Motorola and Nokia, respectively). But Microsoft squandered Nokia's manufacturing assets and would need to either start from scratch or acquire somebody else. But there aren't many manufacturers left that are decent, non-Chinese, and willing to sell.

There's also the option to pair with a manufacturer and ask them to put Microsoft's OS on their phones, but Google would most likely lean on anybody attempting that and threaten to revoke their access to Android trademark and Google Services. Samsung is the only manufacturer in a position to tell them to suck it but they're locked into a complex struggle with Google and it's anybody's guess if taking Microsoft on board would help or hinder their position.

[–] yildo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The appeal of the "we could have been a contender" fantasy for Microsoft is the idea that they'd be printing money by collecting the 30% tax on apps and in-app purchases. If they were 100% dependent on Samsung, they'd be printing at least 50% less money

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Microsoft does make phones - the Surface Duo line. Unfortunately it's really not comparable to other phones in the same price range.