this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
304 points (95.2% liked)

World News

38977 readers
3492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The reason is that they're assholes. They claim that they can't do it because there's no assurance of return and because they're worried about Hamas. Sorry, those are not reasons to ignore a humanitarian crisis at your border.

[–] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What would happen if Hamas started launching attacks against Israel from Egyptian soil?

[–] hh93@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Then Egypt needs to eliminate the threat of Hamas in their country.

Oh - that's not possible without collateral damage since the absolute love using civilians as human shields? Better not take them in and let Israel take the blame...

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd hope Egypt would then work together with Israel on disarming Hamas on Egyptian soil.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

By bombing Egyptian soil?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you saying they shouldn't take in refugees just in case Hamas attacks from Egypt because it might result in an Israeli response? Because you could make that same argument about Ukrainians fleeing to Poland. They might secretly be backing Russia. What if they launch attacks against Ukraine from Polish soil?

EDIT: I'm sorry, you can downvote me all you like, but this is a bullshit excuse to stop taking in people who are facing a genocide. Egypt sees a genocide happening on their border and, instead of letting refugees in, they say, "why can't Europe take care of it?" I'm sorry, it's bullshit. They're complicit in this genocide. They aren't the cause- the cause is Israel- but they're complicit. They're letting Gazans die.

[–] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Alright, let me ask this question. Why does Hamas exist in Palestine? Did Palestine take any steps to remove or eliminate Hamas before this war broke out?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What relevance does that have to Egypt refusing to help refugees fleeing from a genocide? Should no one take in Gazan refugees?

[–] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because if the government of Palestine and the people of Palestine were willingly housing a known terririst organization, I might be hesitant to let them through my country as well.

Or would you let Russians from either the occupied Luhansk or Donetsk oblast stay with you?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well it's either be terrified of letting terrorists into your country or be complicit in a genocide. Personally, I would say 'don't be complicit in genocide.' You apparently would say the opposite.

[–] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because it’s so simple for you eh? You are a disingenuous, bad faith actor. You know as well as I do that you would never allow your family or friends to be put at risk for either Israel or Gaza, so stop acting like you have the high moral ground here.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I absolutely would put my family at risk to help stop a genocide. How is Hamas going to even attack Israel? With what weapons? Do you think they would be allowed to bring missiles across the border with them? Do you think they would just let everyone run through without stopping them at checkpoints?

Again, it's either be afraid of a hypothetical terrorist attack or help stop an actual genocide.

[–] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then stop armchair arguing with me on a website and go fucking help them, and take your wife and kids while you’re at it.

My god the people on this website who think they’d be so much better at things than elected officials or trained servicemembers or ems is astounding.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How would you advise I do that?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Why does Hamas exist in Palestine?

At least partially because Israel saw it as beneficial.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Did Palestine take any steps to remove or eliminate Hamas before this war broke out?

With, let me guess, weapons Israel gave them to do it?

Seriously how do you expect people to get rid of a theocratic dictatorship, without external help, in the situation that Gaza is in.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Forced displacement of a people *is a war crime" and given the Nakba it's not such a bad idea to not give this to Israel. We've played this game before in 1948 and did any refugee from that era get to ever return home? Nope.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

So Egypt can't take them because it would allow Israel to commit a war crime by displacing them, but Egypt thinks Europe should take them

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, then what should Gazans do, stay put and die? Because unless they're either staying put or somehow getting into Israel, Egypt sounds like their only option. Except Egypt won't allow it.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gazans and double nationals are as we speak now at the Rafah crossing and no government was able to get them out.

What they should do is get aid and a ceasefire and an end to the blockade. There is nothing you can expect from a group of civilians dying every day under bombing. There is nothing they as a group "should do" other than try to survive and not be forced out of their homeland.

Even if they get to leave, their lives will still be shit. Once a refugee forever a refugee.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So you're basically saying Gazans should stay put and hope that there's peace before they're murdered. I see.