this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
624 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
4092 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 245 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Firefox with good plugins is even better!

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Absolutely! Another really good fork of FF to check out is Floorp I'm thinking of making it my main and going steady :) https://floorp.app/en/

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unless browser fingerprinting is your concern, in which case the most generic, unmodified browser is best (e.g. Tor).

But that is a huge topic for another thread.

[–] finn_der_mensch@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Overall you‘re right but in which world is tor generic and unmodified 😂

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

It's not possible to identify you if you use the tor browser without changing the window size or any other settings, because the fingerprint is literally the same amongst everyone that uses it this way. So you kind of blend in with the masses, it's neither generic nor unmodified, I give you that :D

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

The Tor browser is a modified version of Firefox, but you are not meant to modify the Tor Browser, in order for everyone using the Tor Browser to look the same and blend in. This is done for maximum privacy and anonymity.

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Simply the OS already makes that difficult, true. Nonetheless, it's one of your best bets.

For those who truly want to stay private, installing plugins on the Tor browser is obviously a no go. Changing any setting or even the window size should not be done. Seriously.

And I'd venture that Tor on phones might be the most homogenous, though that still isn't saying a lot, sadly. Plus, smartphones are a privacy nightmare regardless (tip of the iceberg).

In the end, fingerprinting makes true privacy very challenging. Great introduction to the topic.

And an advanced writeup with excellent resources for those who really want to get into the subject matter.

Edit: spelling

[–] fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

This is the way

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

And LibreWolf is better. It's Firefox with all of the privacy settings preconfigured and uBlock Origin preinstalled. Also, crap like Sponsored sites and Pocket are removed.

[–] SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Been very happy with Librewolf. Thought it would be another one of those softwares recommended by linux-losers but which never actually works, but it's quite the opposite.

[–] clegko@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is LibreWolf still a version or two behind on Gecko?

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AFAIK the most recent Firefox version is 118.0.2 and LibreWolf is based on that

[–] clegko@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Word. Last I had looked, they lagged a version or two behind on the base FF version. Likely just a lack of contributors or something then. Ty.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

They used to lag behind, but now they caught up, so I can recommend LibreWolf to anyone without worries from a security perspective.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is Librewolf different from Mullvad browser, which is supposed to be Tor browser (hardened FF) without the Tor?

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Mullvad Browser is based on the Tor browser, but it doesn't use the Tor network, whereas LibreWolf is based on Firefox + arkenfox user.js. LibreWolf is better for normal day-to-day browsing, where as Mullvad is meant to be used for high privacy/security tasks. Mullvad is kinda hard to daily drive, because it can't be configured to save cookies, you can't really use extensions and it lacks some other things. These features were removed in the Tor browser, because as I said, it's meant for high thread model usage. Edit: I like the Mullvad browser and I use it myself, but not as my daily driver.

[–] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

High threat*

Not trying to correct you at all, only for ppl's understanding :)

Btw ty for mentioning Mulvad Browser. I liked it honestly but it's still new, you feel me.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks, just realized that this is not !privacy@lemmy.ml and people here are probably not aware of threat modeling. But in this context just the word 'thread' might actually fit better as the threat model pretty much stays the same.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Waterfox is similar, though it doesn’t install additional extensions but comes with a bit of look and feel customization options instead. It restores those non-floating tabs from quantum by default and is pretty speedy.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Waterfox is more for look and feel, whereas LibreWolf makes significant privacy improvements. You can choose for yourself. Btw: You can also customize the UI on LibreWolf, just enable userChrome.css customization under Settings -> LibreWolf -> 'Allow userChrome.css customization'. Now, you can customize everything you want.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yes, Wolf is a lot more focused on privacy, but it’s also a secondary goal for Waterfox. In 6.0 they enabled DNS over Oblivious HTTP (no idea what that means but you probably do) by default and incorporated yokkoffing’s Betterfox preconfig of user.js. It’s for those who are concerned about privacy but not nearly as much as the privacy community. For me, I’d rather have cookies.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

they enabled DNS over Oblivious HTTP (no idea what that means but you probably do)

It's basically the standard DNS-over-HTTPS functionality that is already present in almost every browser but routed over a special proxy server. Unfortunately though, Firefox uses Cloudflare services for this.

For me, I’d rather have cookies.

I also have LibreWolf configured to store cookies. It blocks 3rd-party cookies though.

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the only thing greater than Firefox is Librewolf.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Or hardened Firefox, which is pretty much the same thing (I use Librewolf myself for convenience).

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I love Firefox, used it for years. However I eventually had to switch because of weird bugs and issues with functioning sites. In my sparing personal usage I didn’t run into many issues, but using it at work I ran into really weird issues all the time.