this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
35 points (92.7% liked)
Programming
17366 readers
457 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In the case of your example we'd do
.map(&:unwrap)
in Ruby (if unwrap was a method we'd actually want to call)Notably, these are not the cases
_1
and_2
etc are for. They are there for the cases that are not structurally "call this method on the single argument to the block" e.g..map{ _1 + _2 }
or.map { x.foo(_1) }
(
_1
is reasonable, because iterating over an enumerable sequence makes it obvious what it is;_1
and_2
combined is often reasonable, because e.g. if we iterate over a key, value enumerable, such as what you get from enumerating aHash
, it's obvious what you get; if you find yourself using_3
or above, you're turning to the dark side and should rethink your entire life)