this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
460 points (77.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54121 readers
591 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

whatever will the millionaires do????

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Well technically it is the record labels' jobs. I think most big artists don't interact directly with Spotify but through a label that signed them when they were small and takes 90% of the income from their songs.

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. When you see someone whingeing about how little they earned from x amount of streams, go look up what spotify pays per stream, do the maths, it never adds up.

It's because they signed a shitty publishing / label deal. I've got plenty of music on spotify and tbh have earned more in royalties from streams than I ever did via labels in this day and age (though there was a 'golden age' where digital downloads paid very well, assuming the label manager wasn't on the fiddle). Spotify could prob pay a little more per stream at this point though.

[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Spotify pays like 0.003 per stream the fuck are you talking about? Either you are racking up millions of plays or you are straight talking out your ass. Granted taking a shitty label deal is not something to promote, but don't act like Spotify actually pays shit, because it does not....

Selling 20 albums at $10 would net around $200, getting 20 people to listen to your album on Spotify nets maybe 80 cents.....

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

You don't own songs on spotify, you merely license the temporary right to listen to them. Therefore the proper comparison is not album sales, it's radio plays.

Now I don't know the average rate for radio licensing, but I'm willing to bet big money that it's absolutely nowhere near $200 for 20 people listening.

Maybe radio is not as cheap as spotify, maybe not, but famously spotify is not profitable so the labels are still to blame regardless.

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I worked at labels for years... that's not the way it works

If an artist is enough of a dummy to blow their entire advance unwisely quitting their job, spend months in the studio, and get an elaborate tour bus: the label will pay for it but those expenditures are weighed against your royalties. Scummy labels exist, sure, but often the artist went on a spending spree with what anointed to a loan the label was paying them.

Spotify also pays absolute garbage and fucks bands harder than most labels were ever able to

[–] small44@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com 0 points 11 months ago

They get fractions of a penny per play, you are better off streaming it once on SoundCloud for them then listening a hundred times on Spotify. All the dick riding here is from people who do not understand the business model of streaming services and how they steal all profit from those creators bringing content to their platform. Ad monetization does not fucking work it creates businesses with massive losses so data brokers can eventually scoop up the data from the ashes of the service and feed it to marketing departments at other companies for a fee, and no artists do not get a cent from those sales it's a joke. Buy directly from the artist on band camp or donate via patreon if they have it.