this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
914 points (96.4% liked)

World News

39380 readers
1928 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Australians have resoundingly rejected a proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in its constitution and establish a body to advise parliament on Indigenous issues.

Saturday’s voice to parliament referendum failed, with the defeat clear shortly after polls closed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WilliamTheWicked@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How the hell are we taking so many steps backwards as a species? "I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!"

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

At what point backwards in time was it normative indigenous peoples get representation in government?

Sometimes progress is slow, and many younger people being upset about a 'no' to indigenous representation is exactly the kind of thing that eventually leads to steps forward.

It's just very much the case that many people today are upset with how slow social progress seems to be taking. But in large part, that's because of how quickly social issues are advancing for new generations relative to how slowly older generations set in antiquated ways are disappearing from the equation.

What was the average age of who voted on the measure?

What's the average age of the people looking at the result with disappointment?

The gap will tell you roughly how long it's going to take for that change to start to meaningfully happen.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll answer your question if you can tell me why you put quotes around your second sentence?

[–] HejMedDig@feddit.dk 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's in quotes, because it's a quote from Zoolander

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, an actual quote, thought you might be one of those brutes who use quotation marks instead of any other form of punctuation. In the Old Forum, there was a good community for signage with this kind of thing. My favorite was a marijuana dispensary sign with "taxes and fees included".

The answer to your question is greed enabled through capitalism; it makes people think there isn't enough because most people are constantly being abused by the system and don't have enough, as it was designed.

[–] WilliamTheWicked@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Noooo. Sorry. Just a regular brute, I fear . I do comprehend sentence structure.