this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1540 points (89.8% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29056 readers
7 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello World,

Today, after careful consideration and evaluation of recent events, we have decided to defederate from Lemmygrad.

Regrettably, we have observed a significant increase in hate speech and calls to violence originating from the Lemmygrad instance. Due to the severity of the posts and comments, we are not waiting for the next Lemmy update that will allow users to block instances.

At Lemmy.world, we have always strived to foster an inclusive and welcoming user environment. However, recent posts and comments from Lemmygrad have clearly violated our server rules and, more importantly, our core values. We firmly believe that hate speech and incitement of violence have no place in our community, regardless of personal beliefs or affiliations.

As always, we encourage all users to report any content they deem inappropriate or harmful. No matter one's stance in any conflict, Lemmy.world will always take immediate action to remove and ban any posts or comments that incite violence or propagate hatred.

We encourage everyone to continue engaging in discussions within the boundaries of respect and understanding. As we move forward with this decision, we remain committed to providing all community members with a safe and welcoming space. We appreciate your continued support and cooperation in upholding our shared principles.

Thank you,

The Lemmy.World Team

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago (26 children)

I understand that they are staunchly pro-communist and also take a pro-Palestine, including some of them (many of them?) a more clearly pro-Hamas stance. And that all of this could annoy many of the centrist liberals that seem to dominate here. But from perusing the lemmygrad link I do not see clear signs of hate speech, certainly not a clear hate speech agenda as you would see with some hate groups. And judging by the comments on here many seem to be happy to be “rid of them” because they are “annoying”, or “immature”, or “tankies”, or whatever. It really reads largely like “their opinions annoy me” so I’m glad they’re gone.

There may be more to it, I don’t know, but personally I wouldn’t like lemmy.world, an otherwise fine instance by all means, to become a centrist liberal silo where no other opinion outside (mostly US-centric) liberal orthodoxy is heard. So yeah, not convinced that this was the right decision, basically because of a lack of evidence.

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Hexbear and Grad users defend genocidal regimes like Ruzzia and China. They excuse their crimes and argue in bad faith. I had so many insane discussions before I decided to block both of these instances entirely.

They are, by every single sense of the word, tankies.

Tankie is not just an oblivious term that has no meaning. It signifies a red fascist. It's like arguing that it's bad that we don't let neonazis in discussions. They do not care about discussing. All they want is to spread their disgusting ideas while hiding them behind leftism.

By defederating from these instances, we don't become less leftists. These people are not leftist.

This is not a slippery slope. It is a necessary step to ensure the growth of this website and actually worthwhile discussions.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well spoken.

interacting with them does nothing but benefit them and the spread of their lies and propaganda. It brings nothing of value for anyone else.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It can be worth to set a counter-point. But I wouldn't do so in hopes of changing the tankie's mind. Rather to help the audience.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Elevating propaganda and lies to the level of proper discourse services no purpose but giving them false legitimacy and wider spread.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I guess we summed up two main arguments for both sides in neat one-liners.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

I mostly agree, except:

These people are not leftist.

They are leftists, on top of the genocide they support they're also all for workers owning the means of production. Leftism isn't "when good," right isn't "when bad," left and right are economic distinctions symbolizing the people on one side and the aristocracy on the other. There can in fact be "bad leftists" just as there can be "bad rightoids." Bad people exist everywhere, not just at republican conventions.

[–] Seudo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Can't deradicalize extremists without engaging them. Not to say where and when that should happen, or that the moral argument is even relevant. As Popper said in the wake of WWII,

If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Piers@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I expect you need to look in the Lemmy.World moderation log to see to what degree lemmy.ml users were or were not problematic (I've no idea either way.)

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Moderation logs are largely public, you can check it yourself.

[–] Piers@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I could but I'm not the person who cares enough to want to look into it. I'm telling the person who does that doing so is a good idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good idea, if anyone can point me to it or to specific examples, I would appreciate it. Also do not care enough to start an investigation by myself.

Fwiw, I wouldn’t judge an entire instance by a handful individual posts. Users will be users. But still, some evidence would be a lot better than no evidence. Plenty of evidence would be even better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I was harassed by them and insulted for not agreeing with them (mistakenly commented in one of their instances posts) and elsewhere and they kept saying certain people deserve to die (which I’d classify as hate speech).

When there’s so many that can bombard or overwhelm the rest of the discussion they should stick to their own echo chamber. I don’t see the same problem you do with defederating from them and am more likely to use the site more without their presence.

Edit: We also don’t know what the mods or admins are seeing and removing from them. I couldn’t even have a conversation without being overwhelmed and shouted out/insulted

[–] nephs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A link of any specific comment, please?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sudneo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I am not sure how many it's "them", but I usually just make very liberal use of the block function. I had very bad experiences from people from multiple instances (sopuli, .ee, etc.) and I have always blocked the people. It's a click of a button, and soon you can ban whole instances...

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Yes… agree with this take. I’m disappointed in the Lemmy World Admins for this move..

If Lemmy World is going to just defederate from instances where the opinions of users of one instance annoy the admins, then I will withdraw my monthly donation and go elsewhere.

Also, seems like there should be more of a process involved in defederation than a knee jerk post where the admins assure us it was a decision made with lots of deliberation. Despite that, it all feels very abrupt and top down and driven more by the admins’ personal geo-political opinions about recent events than other factors.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] GenEcon@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I discussed a lot with people at lemmygrad and lemmy.ml. Because I really thought that these are people from a developing nation, which are fed russian and chinese propoganda all day and giving a second perspective benefits the discussion.

Ive never gotten death threats before. Now I got dozens. And not in private messages, but straight up as comment.

[–] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not sure that I would share your attitude in “benefiting” a developing nation with your perspectives, but yeah, death threats not cool in any case. As I said in my original comment, there may be more to this than meets the eye. Maybe these guys are being jerks and intolerant of other viewpoints more often than not, can’t tell. As far as I’m concerned it is ok for people to argue passionately, angrily even, so long as they do not seek to undermine discussion or, worse, hurt others just because they disagree with them.

[–] GenEcon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thats not what I said. I said that my perspective would benefit the discussion, comming from a western country. Compared to the perspective that was voiced in the discussion before, which was pretty one-sided. You know, to get a whole picture.

[–] gcheliotis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, ok; it just read like that. Maybe I misunderstood.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

tl;dr of this ramble: ignore the paradox of tolerance!!!

give me a break. If you disagree with this, set up your own instance or find another, you're acting like you are now cut off from this instance and thus this entire instance will become an echo chamber because it doesn't tolerate intolerable content. If you actually cared, you'd look at the modlog, but instead you post an emotional reactionary response.

Very cool

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I disagree with this defederation but it's how online political communities work unfortunately. Whatever views the most people generally agree with will become the most visible, that means milquetoast and agreeable "good" points of view will always dominate, ie centrist liberal stances. The communities also become over-paranoid of outside infiltrators, the idea that the space is in some way authentic and pure and needs to be protected.

Over time as things happen in the world and the acceptable view is established, more views become cleaved away until it just becomes an agreeable and boring comment section of people rewarding each other for also having the correct opinions on everything.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Finally a voice of actual moderate reason. Thanks for the well said contribution.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you for saying this. I'd never visited until the ban and probably won't again it's just not my scene. I spent about an hour browsing and saw lots of critique of Israel but never saw hate speech.

I'm disappointed lemmy.world admins consider justifiable criticism hate speech. Maybe I'm missing something but if there was true hate speech it was certainly a small minority and not the majority.

"Hate speech" will be abused because it's a fluid opinion. An echo chamber will emerge.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I could not agree more. Not only are comments removed, and users banned way too easily, is the nuclear option, defederation, used perhaps a bit lightly too.

In my personal experience I much more enjoy the comment sections of the more open instances. Feels much more like the thing I enjoyed most about reddit.

[–] random65837@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There may be more to it, I don’t know, but personally I wouldn’t like lemmy.world, an otherwise fine instance by all means, to become a centrist liberal silo where no other opinion outside (mostly US-centric) liberal orthodoxy is heard. So yeah, not convinced that this was the right decision, basically because of a lack of evidence.

Neither would I, I'm a Libertarian, so I have beliefs on both sides, and more importantly, I think for myself. But let's be real, what we wind up with isn't honest questions, or people honestly questioning why either side has a belief out of honest curiosity, it's hatred and trolling, and I don't mean "hatred" in the 2023 version, where it's everything you disagree with, I mean the actual definition of the word.

I't sad because nobody should have to put themselves in a like minded echo chamber, people should be able to interact with each other like adults, but again, it's 2023, and I fear that's not coming back.

load more comments (12 replies)