World News

22072 readers

152 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

102

Ex-Human Rights Watch chief - Israel violating humanitarian law in Gaza (www.aljazeera.com)

submitted 1 year ago by ram@bookwormstory.social to c/news@beehaw.org

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

ghostarchive.org

Israel’s decision to deprive Palestinian civilians living in Gaza of access to basic needs violates international law, former Human Rights Watch chief Kenneth Roth said.

“In the realm of humanitarian necessities, the Israeli government has imposed a siege on all of Gaza,” Roth said in an interview with Al Jazeera.

Roth, who now teaches at Princeton University, added that the atrocities committed by the Hamas armed group against Israeli civilians do not justify the “revenge” and “collective punishment” against Palestinian civilians.

“A basic premise of international humanitarian law is that war crimes by one side never justify war crimes by the other. There’s an independent obligation by both sides to respect the laws of war.

“It increasingly does look like the Israel military is proceeding without adequate care to spare civilians. And that kind of indiscriminate and disproportionate attack … is in itself a war crime.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I do. They let Kim be their ruler do they not?

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it's the fault of oppressed people for being oppressed?

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can take a walk through history and see oppressor and oppressed in every era. A common thread is when people are oppressed by internal forces they either revolt and take power or simply live with the oppression. Even the attempt to revolt is important.

Gaza has a two fold problem. First they ruled by Hamas who don't give a shit about them. Plenty of Palestinians hate Hamas, but not enough to make a difference. Secondly, they are oppressed by Israel due to Hamas.

They can either live with this or revolt. They've chosen to live with it.

[–] rgb3x3@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago

Man, it's a real sign of living the privileged, easy life when someone thinks this way.

Those people try to revolt and they die. They don't revolt and still die. What kind of choice is that?

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Palestinians literally protest this situation all the time, but are ignored, or shot for it.

"You didn't violently rebel, so anything that happens to you (and your children) afterwards is your fault." This is some straight evil shit.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

So according to you, Hamas is oppressing Palestinians, and Israel is oppressing Hamas, but it's only righteous for Palestinians to stand up to Hamas. Isn't it also important for Hamas to stand up to their oppressors?

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. They didnt.

Seriously. Shut the fuck up. Theres 75 years of history you missed out on and youre exposing your lack of education.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

After WWIi the UN created N Korea, because the Japanese that occupied the entire peninsula, had withdrawn and because the Soviets as well as the US both felt they should have control. Russia soon got bored with a sphere of influence in the Pacific.

Got it right so far?