this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
124 points (74.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43856 readers
2267 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This would save young Americans from going into crippling debt, but it would also make a university degree completely unaffordable for most. However, in the age of the Internet, that doesn't mean they couldn't get an education.

Consider the long term impact of this. There are a lot of different ways such a situation could go, for better and for worse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the wrong question. Just nationalize higher education and subsidize or make it free, at least to the point the we're producing enough engineers, medical doctors, scientists, artists, and etcetera every year.

[โ€“] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I would be 100% on board with living in a society that says "go as far as you can". If people doing the teaching say that a person is able to benefit and they have room, I want that person to learn.

A more educated society is a benefit to everyone, not just the person who's getting the education.