this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
489 points (89.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12220 readers
777 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 116 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (54 children)

"If you can look at the situation and not be on the side of Palestinians, then you are on the wrong side of apartheid and history will show that in time,"

This post on her part was fine, but the other one...not so much. She should have stuck with this one only, rather than whatever the frick murderous thing that other post was.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (32 children)

Is there a quote for the other post? I heard it was just paraphrased, so we don't know what she actually said

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 37 points 1 year ago (31 children)

Can someone please tell the freedom fighters in Palestine to flip their phones and film horizontal," she wrote on the platform on Saturday.

That's all. If you're very inattentive or deliberately misinterpreting her words, you'd think that she was endorsing Hamas as "freedom fighters".

But if you DO pay attention and know anything, you'll notice that she never mentions Hamas and know that Hamas aren't usually the ones filming any of their atrocities. Add her clarification from a few days later and it's clear that she did NOT endorse Hamas and is the victim of character assassination because she had the temerity to speak up against the apartheid regime:

I just want to make it clear that this statement in no way shape or form is [inciting] spread of violence," she said. "I specifically said freedom fighters because that's what the Palestinian citizens are... fighting for freedom every day.

[–] z500@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm confused. Who else is fighting besides Hamas and the IDF?

[–] simply_surprise@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade is the militant wing of Fatah, the al-Quds Brigades are the militant wing of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the DFLP is also active as the Martyr Omar Al-Qasim Forces.

It's not just Hamas.

[–] z500@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks, that's what I was wondering

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are other kinds of fighting than violence on a grand scale. Regular Palestinians are fighting the apartheid regime in ways big and small every day.

[–] z500@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks, that's pretty much what I figured you'd say. The down vote was a nice touch.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I have this odd quirk of downvoting sealions when they ask bad faith questions with obvious answers that they refuse to accept. I'm kooky like that!

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you distinguish between a good faith question and “sealioning”?

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A good faith question is when you're honestly seeking clarification either because you don't know something or don't know what the other person means.

Sealioning is when you're "just asking questions" in a manipulative manner with no intention of taking the answers seriously under consideration or making a valid point of your own.

It's often used in place of an actual argument when the sea lion knows that their point isn't strong enough to withstand scrutiny.

Here's the origin of the term afaik:

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

defining is when you decide or declare that a certain string of words is equivalent to a word.

distinguishing is when you decide or declare which of two categories a particular thing is in

I know the definition of these words. I’m asking you distinguish, as you read comments on the internet, which are which kind?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Subtle, I like it

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (49 replies)