Asklemmy

43958 readers

1748 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

105

What games do you think should NEVER be remastered, because they're close to perfect as they are? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Que@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

105 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Any games where a remaster could never stack up to the original.

Inspired by this post, asking the opposite, what games do you think are worthy of a remaster: https://lemmy.ml/post/6091201

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly hard question because essentially you want a game that would be worse now. Something that playing now would tranish it then make it better even with updated graphics/movement. Or something you know the company would take a direction which would make it negative.

Something like redoing the original Super Mario 1, 2 and 3. Where the updated graphics and changes to game play takes away from the original pixel feel. As I feel Nintendo would probably use modern day Mario design.

~~or mass effects removal of zoooming in on mirandas butt~~

[–] onoki@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn't Mario remastered for SNES? I preferred those over the NES versions.

[–] tonarinokanasan@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They were remastered (which I think hurts the original argument), but I as I understand, the question of which is better is pretty divisive

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I am unaware of any difference other than the obvious visual one. I never owned a SNES back in the day, so I kinda missed All Stars, and even when emulating became cool, I never saw a reason to emulate a game that then made me choose which game I wanted to play, rather than just choose the ROM for the game I wanted.

[–] Que@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed, SMW was actually the first thing that popped into my head when writing the post subject, SMB1-3 definitely qualify too. I'd put them all on equal footing in this regard.