this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
954 points (95.3% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
1933 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A technocracy is a type of oligarchy and is compatible with democracy tho

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A technocrats actually makes sense. But that isn't practical. People always at some point end up hiring their friends and putting people they know in positions of power. Nepotism and cronyism are just natural progressions, even when systems of governance start out with good intentions. Eventually someone always ruins it for everyone else.

[–] ThePyroPython@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What about random-selection jury-style technocracy?

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

that doesn't sound like a technocracy or an oligarchy of any kind. that just sounds like direct democracy by lots, unless i am misunderstanding you.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

A robust series of checks and balances would also help.

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

i guess, but only as much as any other oligarchy. you can have democracy where the only people who can vote are people with doctorates in stem fields, or who're land owning white men, or who have their patents of nobility, or who have at least a million USD in their bank account. but really it's not particularly in keeping with the ideal that people are usually talking about when they say 'democracy'.