this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
92 points (88.3% liked)

Videos

14313 readers
455 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anonymoose@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Two cities of a certain size that are within the distances that high speed rail makes sense over driving or flying. It makes sense to connect Los Angeles to San Francisco, for instance. However, there isn't that much density in a large part of the country to justify the cost of high speed rail currently.

Hell, a big complaint with California's HSR implementation is that it isn't initially connecting either of the two main cities; those segments are still under design.

So a high speed rail trip cross country isn't going to be viable any time soon, and likely shouldn't be planned for beyond mandating a federal electrification and signaling standard.

[–] anonymoose@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the explanation!