this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
160 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2588 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is not oil shortage, because there is no oil shortage. The shale boom gave the US plenty of oil and gas to pump up. And there is plenty of coal too. Enough to last us for at least several decades. The problem is that, in doing so, we would destroy our climate.

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a shortage of cheap oil.

Time was you could find it bubbling up on the surface. Then you had to dig for it. Then you had to frack. Then oil was expensive enough to justify going back to the old oilfields and pumping water down some of them to push it into the others.

Sure, there's oil there, but it's harder and harder to get. That's why protected areas that still have easy oil are a target for the oil companies.

[–] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok yes, the EROI is going down.

But the point is that it doesn't matter if there is oil shortage or not. Even if there would be oil shortage, it is not (and should not be) the main reason why we're moving away from oil.

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Economic reasons are the best reasons. They're the reasons that work.

I don't think it matters why we move away from oil, as long as we do.

[–] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They are the path of least resistant yes. But that path often leads to collective losses, or if the stakes are high, like in climate change, to collective destruction. We get stuck in the Nash equilibrium of a prisoners dilemma.

[–] spauldo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's true. Without economic pressure it's a lot harder to get governments to cooperate, though. If economics favor you it's easier to get the right laws passed.