this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
50 points (79.8% liked)

Dad Jokes

15578 readers
235 users here now

Description

This is a community for sharing those cheesy “dad” jokes that invoke an eye roll or chuckle.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

10-4

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Took me a while, then realised there is a country that uses whack date formatting. dd/mm/yyyy is the true king. All others shall bow.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

yyyy/mm/dd is the one true date

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only for file storage organisation. But I'll agree on that use case only.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

IMO it's actually the best for everything. dd/mm/yyyy is ambiguous due to the American date format existing.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does American date formatting have to do with anything / anyone outside of America?

DMY is the perfect progression. 2nd of the 3rd, 23. Perfect sense logically speaking.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What does American date formatting have to do with anything / anyone outside of America?

If you see a date somewhere, you can't ever be 100% sure that it's dd/mm/yyyy, as an American may have written it. On the other hand, yyyy-mm-dd is unambiguous.

DMY is the perfect progression.

That's not the case when written with a time next to it, because in that case it's inconsistent and "backwards" compared to the time. The date goes from "smallest" unit (day) to largest unit (year), yet time is written the opposite way, with the largest unit (hour) to the smallest unit (seconds or milliseconds). If you instead do yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss, the entire thing is in a consistent order.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah ymd is better than any alternative by a tenfold