internet funeral

6925 readers

2 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

• !hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

fucker@lemmy.world

FUCKER@lemmy.dbzer0.com

FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz

979

Ashes to Ashes (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world to c/internetfuneral@lemmy.world

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, so each person is a little less than 20% carbon, so a pile of 177 bodies would contain about 2000 kilos of carbon.

Dont forget that almost all of that carbon will be lost as CO2 during oxidation.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You probably meant to reply to the parent comment, as this is one of the "weird assumptions" I explicitly called out (that almost all of the carbon would be lost).