this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
62 points (87.8% liked)

Australia

3520 readers
141 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone
dalekerrigan@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
62
Why cyclists should NOT get the same fines as motorists | Car Culture 6 - Motonormativity (youtu.be)
submitted 11 months ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nath@aussie.zone 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's nothing to do with that. It's about lack of consequences. A $10 fine is no deterrent at all for obeying the law. For any road user.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's well-known that severity of punishment has very little bearing on deterrent effectiveness. What works is likelihood of facing that punishment at all.

But again, enforcing speed limits on bikes just makes no sense. It's responding to a risk that basically doesn't exist, and any resources that could be spent on it would be far better spent ensuring drivers don't break the law.

Of course, that would require cops doing the right thing in the interest of actual safety. But the truth is, cops don't give a fuck about that. They're as car-brained as our politicians, if not more so. They'll spend heaps of resources enforcing these nonsense speed limits, while they refuse to enforce laws like the minimum passing distance for cyclists even when they're literally handed the evidence needed.

[–] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

while they refuse to enforce laws like the minimum passing distance for cyclists even when they’re literally handed the evidence needed.

It's not enough to show video footage of a car passing a cyclist. The cops need to know who was driving the car.

Police speed/red light/mobile phone/etc infringement notices are only issued if they have an accurate photo of the driver's face (or, if they pull over the vehicle immediately and identify the driver). To achieve that they use powerful flashes when the photo is taken.

A bicycle GoPro is just too small, and has no flash. You'd never be able to identify the driver.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago
  1. Police have the power to require the owner of the car nominate who was driving at a given time. They just refuse to use it.
  2. They refuse to prosecute even when evidence of the driver is available (for example, when you catch up to them later and clearly show their face).