this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
97 points (95.3% liked)

Games

16798 readers
824 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
97
Game prices are too low, says Capcom exec (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 1 year ago by geosoco@kbin.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works
102 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Capcom's president and chief operating officer has said he thinks game prices should go up.

Haruhiro Tsujimoto made the comments at this year's Tokyo Game Show, Nikkei reported. TGS is sponsored by the Computer Entertainment Supplier's Association, a Japanese organisation which aims to support the Japanese industry, which Tsujimoto is currently the chairman of.

"Personally, I feel that game prices are too low," Tsujimoto said, citing increasing development costs and a need to increase wages.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Basic fucking inference, ever heard of it?

We aren't talking about the "console" used to run the motherfucking game, or some peripheral. A game for SNES comes with it's own fucking storage – the bloody cartridge – while a modern digital game doesn't. If you can't get two neurons to fire at the same time, then the discussion really is over.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Nintendo used cartridges up until pretty recently... as far as I'm aware, the prices never exceeded $60.

[–] hogart@feddit.nu 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Digital games and physical games are the same price on the Nintendo Switch. They were the same on the Wii U, the Wii as well. Nintendo never stopped selling physical games. It's the same on PlayStation as well with the same price. At least it was on my Ps4. The larger piece of plastic didn't cost more in the 90s compared to the smaller piece of plastic in 2023. The manual/handbook also didn't cost anything noteworthy to produce back then. I really don't know where you are pulling these costs from.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy fuck, imagine being so completely alienated from the process of creating technology that you believe pressing disks costs the same as soldering circuits.

[–] hogart@feddit.nu 0 points 1 year ago

I'm still puzzled you compare soldering circuits 30 years ago with pressing a disk today. Games took a year to one and a half with about 15 people to develop compared to teams of 100 working for years. Like I stated earlier, the electrical bills alone to create the new AAA titles today are probably equal to the entire development budget of the AAA titles 30 years ago. However we twist it, we pay the same or less for games now than we did 30 years ago. A lot of games are even free now if you don't fall into the pit of buying skins. We are in a good place.