this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
36 points (80.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43856 readers
1783 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Preferably the hell of the blood-soaked Bible

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] smashboy@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I’ve heard people say the opposite, β€œwouldn’t piss on her if she was on fire”.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is my piss not supposed to be flammable?

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

You should use a condom next time

[–] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

On fire is a good start

On fire and soaked in piss is better

[–] TommySalami@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, hell is supposed to be forever. Eventually the liquid piss would evaporate, leaving behind solid compounds that, in my experience, would still smell quite bad. And then, she'd burst into flames again. Sounds like a win-win.

[–] Case@unilem.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was witness to what burnt piss does on a hot muffler.

It stinks, for miles. And months.

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually both have the same meaning. Pissing on her while she's on fire would be to save her by soaking. And it's the least you can do (easier than getting water). This saying means that they wouldn't save Margaret Thatcher even if it was trivially easy to do so.

[–] smashboy@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you explaining my own joke to me? Why?

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah sorry. Since you mentioned it's the opposite, I wrongly assumed that you didn't know the meaning.

[–] christophski@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

thatsthejoke.jpg