Privacy

31814 readers

247 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Instant Messengers Analysis and Comparison (privacy.awiki.org)

submitted 1 year ago by sir_reginald@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The table is quite big (190+ lines of hand-written HTML) and it doesn't fit on mobile phone screens unless you zoom out. It should be fine on desktop. It also specifies the criteria followed and has analysis of some of the IMs in the table (not close to all of them, I hope to add more analysis in the future).

Counter-arguments are always welcome. Sources and additional information too. Note that the typical privacy recommendation (Signal) is not recommended here. It does not meet our criteria, being centralized and requiring a phone number. I don't want to hate on Signal since it's doing a decent job spreading the importance of E2EE, however we can not recommend it for the given reasons.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IP addresses mainly, which is the worst kind of meta-data as it can be linked to your real location and name relatively easily.

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, XMPP also leaks your IP to the server if you don't use Tor or a VPN. If you don't trust the server, it's a must to hide your IP.

I don't think that changes anything in the comparison. Except Briar, which uses Tor by default, I think that every other messenger reveals your IP to the server if you aren't actively hiding it. That's just how it works. At least SimpleX and XMPP can be used through onion services, something that others don't offer.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The vital difference is that with XMPP you consciously choose a server host (or self-host) that is acting like a proxy for you and thus protects your privacy, even if you don't use Tor.

With SimpleX there is basically a random list of relays that you know next to nothing about, and which could in fact be mostly honey-pots, and you are connecting directly to them, which makes Tor almost mandatory.

For me it boils down to the fact that there is no such thing as trust-less communication, so you should choose carefully whom to trust and minimize the number of people you need to trust. XMPP is IMHO the clear winner on that, because it's basically only your home-server you need to trust.

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

yeah I agree that XMPP is currently the best option.

But SimpleX is also self-hostable, you can configure it to only connect to your own relay server. Or just use .onion servers. So SimpleX is a close second IMO.