this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
964 points (98.2% liked)

Work Reform

9993 readers
139 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if I’m paying for an employee’s commute, I’d like to get some value out of that. That’s money out of my budget I’m spending for no appreciable gains unless they’re producing.

So, like bathrooms. Do you require employees to "produce" while in the bathroom, or do you write it off as part of general expenses along with chairs, lighting, and office cleaning?

Commuting is an expense linked to the production, and should be billed accordingly. The gains, are preparing the employee to produce; just like starting a production line, it doesn't happen instantly.

Strictly speaking, even WFH employees should be paid a "getting up" rate for the time it takes them to get up to working speed.

[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

If I’m actually onsite, my employer has tremendous control over that. They can play the music they want and ban headphones. They can put a bunch of informational literature all over the bathrooms (this is a thing Google does/did). If I start getting paid for the commute, suddenly my employer has the ability to start controlling that.

You and I agree that commute should be paid. What I think you’re lacking right now is my point about the commute being controlled. If it’s paid, it can be controlled, and that’s something I’m personally not comfortable with.