this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
1153 points (88.7% liked)

Comic Strips

11949 readers
2003 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Consider... what went wrong is that no one pushed back on Panel Two using the very same free marketplace of ideas.

Panel One: Fighting for everyone's right to express themselves is fine. Good as it is.

Panel Two: Destroy the bigot's arguments and describe to the public what society will be like if the bigot gets their way. Is that tolerating intolerance?

[–] Nurgle@lemmy.world 55 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. That’s how we were able to nip the whole global warming thing in the bud. Thank god rational arguments always prevail.

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 35 points 11 months ago

Panel Two: Destroy the bigot's arguments and describe to the public what society will be like if the bigot gets their way. Is that tolerating intolerance?

I can't believe no one thought of this. And here planned parenthood and the grieving families at funerals of vets have just been sitting by listening to the noise.

[–] kwking13@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Calling people out on their BS is the right line to draw for me personally, but I still want that person to have the right to express their opinion. We just need to teach people that it's ok to be wrong as long as you can admit it and learn from it. No idea gets processed until pushed from an opposing party.

Sitting back and doing nothing teaches nothing. Calling it appalling and informing the person why they're wrong is the right step toward change. But if you can't say it in a way that makes them hear you, then you're doomed to have the argument all over again.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

The past twenty years have demonstrated handily that logical debate simply does not work. What's needed is the emotive/motivational form of argumentation that puts the speaker's thoughts, beliefs, and intent at center stage and actually does work. Bonus points is that it works regardless of how well educated whoever you're speaking to is so there's no longer the educational barrier in place allowing meaningful conversation.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

I'd say that's tolerating intolerance and is the right thing to do. Once they switch to violence though, remember you have a robust right to defend yourself, your community and your loved ones.

[–] electrogamerman@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

But then you are called anti islamist or isla mophobic. Yes, i went there.

[–] Piers@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yes it is tolerating intolerance.