this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
-4 points (33.3% liked)

Україна | Ukraine 🇺🇦

1474 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Ukraine!

Ласкаво просимо в Україну!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jorgesumle 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Russia signed the Budapest Memorandum, and in return Ukraine gave up their nuclear deterrent.

The memoranda, signed in Patria Hall at the Budapest Convention Center with US Ambassador Donald M. Blinken amongst others in attendance,[3] prohibited the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, "except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations." As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

Are you going to argue that Russia is acting in self defense?

Edit

From the article

tensions more broadly, at the heart of the Maidan protests was the push by some Western governments, especially the United States, to isolate Russia by supporting the integration of peripheral parts of the former Soviet Union into European and Atlantic institutions

This implies Ukraine and others have no sovereignty and are just vassel states of the US. This is deliberate backwards thinking and patently false. Yes, the West will support and encourage democracies, so what? You'd rather we didn't?

We, the West, have done enough shameful things in the middle east, supporting Ukraine is the polar opposite.

[–] gun@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Budapest Memorandum was violated and therefore nullified before 2014. It literally says that in your wikipedia article

[–] Francisco 1 points 1 year ago

Where does it says so? Can you point to that specific section of the text? I've just checked and must have missed it, it wasn't there.

[–] jorgesumle 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Are you going to argue that Russia is acting in self defense?

It seems like both regimes violated their treaties: Kiev Violates Minsk Agreement Causing Fighting To Resume In Ukraine. There was also an oral treaty that talked about eastern expansion of NATO (which some call "a terrorist organization"), but it wasn't written, as far as I know. The USA also acted in "self-defense" against many countries, nearly 400 according to Wikipedia.

[–] Francisco 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, why does Russia not have loads of troops near the border with Finland?

Surely, if NATO is such a threat. Why?

[–] jorgesumle 0 points 1 year ago

I don't know you, but I'm being forced to pay more taxes and the inflation caused by the economic sanctions to support this puppet regime that bans all opposition, forces people to die on the battlefield and doesn't let people leave the country.

Whataboutism. Internal conflicts are internal matters for sovereign nations.

There was no oral treaty. Russia never asked for anything to be enshrined in an agreement. Don't ask, don't get.

And anyone is free to join NATO, Russia tried to after all.

https://www.military.com/history/russia-once-tried-join-nato-alliance-formed-counter-threats-russia.html

[–] Francisco 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Oral treaty", oral international treaty.... now that sounds like a heavily manipulative level of naivety.

[–] jorgesumle 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's the Russian narrative