this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
497 points (96.4% liked)
pics
19628 readers
253 users here now
Rules:
1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer
2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.
3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.
4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.
5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.
Photo of the Week Rule(s):
1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.
2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is this real or AI generated?
It's real. Taken with my Pixel 7. I wouldn't even know how to generate photos with AI. I have never looked into it.
Dude. Zoom in on that photo you posted -- I think your phone used some kind of scripting to mess with the image.
You need to go buy a separate camera.
I guess I see it when I zoom on the grass. But it's probably because I was zoomed like x6 when I took the photo in the first place, and the phone filled it in.
But honestly, it doesn't take away from my enjoyment of this photo. I don't enjoy photos by zooming in on the grass. I'm just looking at it on my phone and it looks nice. :)
Maybe if I took photos more than once a year I would consider buying a camera, but this was just a case of going to a place with my family and snapping a photo for fun.
Thank you, I really appreciate the kind words.
Thank you for sharing your photo from your day with the family. Please share more from your next adventure!
Thank you! I will!
Fair enough. Just be careful and remember your phone does that.
I was just reading about how to turn it off. It seems like people say to turn on RAW images, but I think that will take up a lot more space? Idk, I haven't tried it yet.
It will take more space, and pictures very zoomed in will look pixelated and noisy. Phones and modern digital cameras do a lot of heavy processing on pictures to make them more attractive. They all do it, heck our brain does it too in everyday life, what we see is not what hits our retina. There's no such thing as pure photography, even during the film era there was a lot of alteration that came with the choice of film and other camera settings. Ignore the Luddite purists, even the most advanced professional cameras do a lot of post-processing even if they do finally save the image to RAW. If the picture looks nice, then it looks nice. The Pixel got creative to fill in pixels it doesn't have to make the picture nice, any other camera would have crapped out and given you a blurry and muddy mess.
Thanks, I feel the same way.
The Pixel series has a ton of postprocessing integrated into the photography. It usually results in something people find eye-popping, but I suppose this is the inevitable result when it sees something unfamiliar.
Shitty phones like huawei are marketing 100mpx cameras using a 5mpx sensor and then use some software crap to upscale the images and everything ends up looking like what you see. It was the precursor of ai generated images as they were using some every similar technology
I don't even have a shitty phone. I have a Pixel 7.