this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
92 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39050 readers
2218 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's crazy to me is that we haven't seen USAF stealth technology in combat since the F-117s in Serbia. Those things were basically undetectable without their weapons bay open and they were only 1st gen designs, plus I bet radar tech hasn't nearly kept pace with stealth since then.

Sometimes I want NATO to intervene in the skies over Ukraine just so I could see the f-35 and f-22 in real combat scenarios. But then I remember that war sucks and think maybe not.

[–] jasory@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

F-22 and F-35 were both deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq. The F-117 wasn't a fighter and never engaged in air-to-air combat (because it couldn't, it was subsonic had poor maneuverability and no active radar) so the F-22 and F-35 both meet the same standard that you are using for "combat" with the F-117.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I meant combat against a competent foe with air defense or fighter capabilities. Airstriking some Taliban in the desert isn't exactly flexing your stealth that much

[–] shinyLane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

F-117 did have radar, it also could carry AIM-9 Sidewinders internally. They trained pilots of 117s to take out AWAC planes... I flew with pilots who trained as such.

Just more bullshit from the internet "know it all."

I dOnT nEeD SoUrCeS bEcAusE tHiS iS aLl TrIvIaL.

You look like a hipster asshat.

[–] jasory@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

If you're going to try to harass me, you should make sure you aren't botching your comments. You edited your comment so now it looks like you are criticizing your original comment, not anything I said.

[–] Creddit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You don’t think you’ve seen USAF stealth technology since the F-117s.