this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
177 points (94.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26734 readers
1311 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joe_archer@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We are not ruled by our monarchy. Their role is purely ceremonial. But yes they are of German descent.

[–] EverPresentPanda@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's ceremonial only by convention. Most of the monarchy's power still legally exists, which to me is ridiculous

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Guess what would happen if they tried to use that power

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They'd be deposed, obviously. Thing is, the very act of deposing them would be an extralegal action, as all laws in the UK are established under the crowns authority. Legally speaking it would be the equivalent of a non-violent coup. Hence ceremonial by convention(de facto), rather than by law(de jure).

[–] UrbonMaximus@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Nothing! Because they already use that power, just not in public. They blatantly exercise their powers to extort judges/politicians/media to their benefit.

[–] EverPresentPanda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There would definitely be a huge backlash. But also a very vocal minority who would probably support them. The end result would be some long overdue changes to our constitutional setup, but given the current state of UK politics, this would be delivered at the end of a highly polarising and disruptive period (I'm thinking Brexit vote level of rancour).

Would be better if we just nipped this in the bud now. Remove the monarchy's constitutional power, and make them fund themselves with their huge existing wealth. They can keep the titles and ceremonies for all I care, just pay for it themselves

[–] joe_archer@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] EverPresentPanda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Every new law passed is signed off by the monarch, a new PM still has to ask royal permission to form a government etc. In practice, these are purely formalities and are treated as such, but still legally there

[–] Syndic@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

The monarchies of Europe were one big family anyway up to WW1.