this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
233 points (98.7% liked)

Steam Deck

14805 readers
134 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Desktop Linux had been a bit behind the others on display features due to the legacy of X. As everybody moves more to Wayland that better enables these sorts of things, they're catching up.

[–] xuniL@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only Nvidia wasn't being such a huge roadblock...

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If only people stopped buying Nvidia...

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately they're not easily avoidable if you need CUDA, there's really no good replacement yet. Most gamers probably don't need CUDA, however

[–] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 1 points 1 year ago

@HughJanus @xuniL it’s also sucks that almost all laptops used navidia. AMD advantage computers are always behind or few.

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only AMD would catch up with raytracing, DLSS, compute, and HDMI 2.1...

Everytime I think about switching to AMD these things always hold me back. There isn't a solution where you can throw money at the problem, unfortunately.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only AMD would catch up with DLSS

DLSS is proprietary NVidia technology. That's just like blaming Nvidia not being able to catch up on CPUs because Intel and AMD did not give them a license for the x86_64 instruction set. AMD supports the other technologies just fine.

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am not saying AMD should get DLSS to run somehow on their GPUs. I am saying that their competiting technology, FSR 2, just isn't at the same quality level. If FSR 2 didn't exhibit extremely bad disocclusion artifacts and particle ghosting, or even worked decently well at lower resolutions, I wouldn't be complaining. But it really is just a subpar upscaling solution that gets beaten out even by Intel's XeSS, which was a late arrival to the scene.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FSR is open source. Patches welcome.

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And your point is? Just because it is open source doesn't make it automatically good and it doesn't excuse the company running the project from being competitive lol.

AMD hardware doesn't have the dedicated AI cores to make it work well anyway.