this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
157 points (97.0% liked)

Games

16690 readers
1000 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
157
Unity will quietly waive controversial fees if developers switch to its ad monetisation service - report (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 1 year ago by geosoco@kbin.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A fresh report into Unity's hugely-controversial decision to start charging developers when their games are downloaded has thrown fresh light on the situation.

MobileGamer sources say Unity has already offered some studios a 100% fee waiver - if they switch over to Unity's own LevelPlay ad platform.

The report quotes industry consultants that say this move is an "attempt to destroy" Unity's main competitior in this field: AppLovin.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Apple engineer here, from what I understand most of Unity’s competitors in the we space are significantly better paying and performing. We keep hearing from developers that nobody wants to use Unity’s product because of that. AppLovin, the one named here, outperforms Unity Ads by as much as 800% in some titles, according to a contact of mine at a game studio. With a difference like that it’s hardly surprising nobody is choosing Unity Ads.

This reeks of desperation, but one wonders how effective it could be - because this demand to drop AppLovin is basically cutting off the revenue faucet for these same developers they’re now trying to extort. No Unity fees but no good income either..

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's this one guy on youtube(https://www.youtube.com/@rossmanngroup), who said about business: [paraphrasing] "Sometimes things go well, and sometimes, you dry to get the change stuck between the couch cushions". And you're right, this pretty much does seem like a desperate move if you think about it.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I love that analogy. When companies deviate from their core business model to try to increase revenue, it's a symptom that the company is dying. If they're having profit issues (which I doubt), a healthy company would innovate to attract customers, not to lock them in.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.youtube.com/@rossmanngroup

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.