this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
813 points (99.3% liked)

Games

32663 readers
2198 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I got some clarifications from Unity regarding their plan to charge developers per game install (after clearing thresholds)

  • If a player deletes a game and re-installs it, that's 2 installs, 2 charges
  • Same if they install on 2 devices
  • Charity games/bundles exempted from fees

Regarding this being abused by bad actors:

Unity says it will use fraud detection tools and allow developers to report possible instances of fraud to a compliance team

- @stephentotilo

[–] nature_man@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That clarification makes it even worse, this is obviously an attempt to push free to play or indie games out the window while making major bank.

The fraud detection will not help at all to prevent abuse especially in cases like steam family sharing where other "users" won't have to pay to install the game!

There's literally no reason to charge per game install here, the only possible reason is greed

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fraud detection is especially bad because they have a financial incentive to ignore, or under-report installation fraud.

[–] nature_man@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly! I'd put money on a group abusing it, admitting to abusing it, and the game devs still being charged in the near future.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So basically they’re explicitly condoning it. That’s not just bad, but even worse that they’re doubling down that a delete+reinstall will charge the dev twice.

This will end a lot of indie projects and they’ve basically destroyed their good standing in indie dev circles.

[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's time to chuck unity in the bin. If not Godot, go for unreal.. though I would check their requirements beforehand first.

[–] teruma@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hard to chuck unity in the bin when you don't use unity.

We're lucky there are enough other engines on the market at the moment, but eventually someone will need to spearhead a FOSS engine with blackjack and hookers.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But does it have the blackjack and hookers? 🤔

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I'd make my own branch with BJ and hookers, but both GCC and Clang failed to compile :(

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm sure somebody somewhere has made both of those games in Godot. Lol

[–] teruma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, fantastic. Good to know, thanks!

So once a game stops selling it had better hope its player base dries up and stops reinstalling it? The way that is phrased makes it sound like you could net lose money over the long term if sales decline and people keep reinstalling it