this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
878 points (97.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17329 readers
9 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
marcar@lemmy.world
WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world
Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml
Terevos@lemm.ee
878
An "airport neighbourhood" where people can store their planes in their yard and taxi directly to the runway (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
206 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Location on a map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=42.1486108&mlon=-88.5628734&zoom=17#map=17/42.14861/-88.56287

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

how commercial jets vs. private jets vs. light aircraft fare

Just looked some up, they're approximately, per passenger:

  • -, bus, ~100...300mpg/pp
  • Commercial jet, -, ~60...120mpg/pp
  • Ultralight, motorbike, train, ~50mpg/pp
  • Light aircraft, car, ~15...60mpg/pp
  • Private jet, limo, ~5...50mpg/pp
  • Fighter jet, monster truck, ~0.5mpg/pp

The more passengers, the more efficient.

So, fully loaded, there isn't that much difference between a private jet, a limo, a car, light aircraft, ultralight, motorbike, train, or low range commercial jet.

But if it's a single person, a private jet would use 10 times more fuel than a motorbike.

A fully loaded bus, still wins hands down.