this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
108 points (76.0% liked)

Games

31818 readers
955 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Seems kind of like the game is just suffering from reactionaries, but I definitely don't put that much stock in critic reviews these days either.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] totallymojo@ttrpg.network 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To me it was a disaster because I expected it to be way more next gen after all these years. And it was very expensive compared to the quality I got.
Meanwhile my friend was all like "Eh, it's fine. Pretty much what I expected."
So I think people had very different expectations.

What I absolutely cannot comprehend is those who say "10/10, game of the century!"
Come on.. No way. If you really think that, you have really low standards or haven't played a new game in 8 years.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I expected it to be way more next gen after all these years

It is "next generation":

  • It's the next generation of huge.
  • It's also the next generation of empty.
  • It's the next generation of pretty.
  • It's also the next generation of soulless.

I mean, it basically heightens all previous design parameters for open world games, does it not?

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It is absolutely NOT the next generation of "pretty". Can't even sign up for the qualifiers for that competition.