Asklemmy

43792 readers

819 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

118

Is there a collection of all human knowledge ever created ? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by saltynuts420@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

74 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Recently I was wandering if there is someone or some group preserving , collecting , organizing and publishing all the knowledge of mankind ever created throughout its existence so that if ever mankind faces the 6th mass extinction we don't have to reinvent the wheel and can have a kick start to our new post apocalyptic civilization .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many reasons most of which you'll only understand if you pay some attention to what's going on behind their scenes.

There are reasons why nowadays pretty much everywhere else on the Internet more content is created all the time than on the Wikimedia projects.

The Wikipedias' "neutral point of view" policy used to mean "we try to treat all sides fairly", now it means "we are writing an unconditional propaganda organ for the status quo". The mainstream media that is accepted as "reliable" as Wikipedia sources just isn't that credible anymore.

Also, when I started editing there, the individual projects were mostly left alone by the WMF. Nowadays the WMF issues intransparent sanctions, up to lifetime bans from all projects, left and right.

I wish someone started an organization with the same goals as the WMF with an actually working system where people could actually enjoy participating.

[–] doubletwist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Be the change you want to see in the world...

Heck most of the hard work is already done for you, since the software that runs Wikipedia is open source.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many people have tried that before. Wikis just aren't that appealing anymore. Today's internet is all about social media.

[–] doubletwist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If there's anything that is absolutely atrocious as a searchable repository of knowledge, it's social media.