this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1852 points (98.6% liked)

Work Reform

9997 readers
212 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As part of his Labor Day message to workers in the United States, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday re-upped his call for the establishment of a 20% cut to the workweek with no loss in pay—an idea he said is "not radical" given the enormous productivity gains over recent decades that have resulted in massive profits for corporations but scraps for employees and the working class.

"It's time for a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay," Sanders wrote in a Guardian op-ed as he cited a 480% increase in worker productivity since the 40-hour workweek was first established in 1940.

"It's time," he continued, "that working families were able to take advantage of the increased productivity that new technologies provide so that they can enjoy more leisure time, family time, educational and cultural opportunities—and less stress."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Even 32 hours a week with a proportional decrease in pay would be a huge improvement.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You shouldn't have to take a cut in pay for this. Productivity has increased and the benefits of the productivity increase has only gone to the ultra wealthy.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But negotiating only for higher wages per hour and lower hours as a package deal could make it harder to get either. It probably depends employer to employer, but doing both at the same time would be hard to make them do.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is why we need to build class solidarity, unions, and strike. A hundred years ago, people fought for everything they could get. They didn't say "safe working conditions or a 40h work week." They said, "we want all we can get."

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago

Yes that'd be good. But I still don't see the advantage of only talking about these as a package deal.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of people are struggling with inflation already. A 20% pay cut is not an improvement.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah not for everyone. I'm thinking higher paying areas like technology and programming where pay is high but people are getting really burned out.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a programmer, and it's very different from hourly work. Realistically, any programmer is coding for like 1-2 hours a day. There are meetings so we understand the problem we have to solve, and a lot of time thinking through the problems and architecture solutions. We're not sitting there typing for 8 hours a day, or at least those are the ones getting burned out. Realistically I'm working like 30 hours a week already, with only 10 hours being real coding, the rest being talking, researching, learning, and pondering. Maybe I'm lucky I work somewhere that that stuff isn't seen as slacking.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Ugh. I once did some independent programming and the guy insisted I do it in front of him because it involved his proprietary data. So much griping about the time I spent looking at documentation or referring to coding assistance sites like Stack Overflow. I quit on day two.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I can see in those specific situations. Cost of living tends to be high in areas with a lot of technology jobs though so I don't know.

I'm not those people so I can't speak for them.

[–] McScience@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly as a mid-career IT person, I'd take a 30-40% cut for that extra day without a second of hesitation.

[–] Piye@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Uh no, speak for yourself and yourself only. I don't want less money, that wouldn't be an improvement