this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
235 points (93.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43747 readers
2316 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's aluminium you stupid Americans.
Only cuz y'all changed it to that
The global sciences community decided on a name change, only one country decided to be contrary.
only one country decided to stay true to the discoverer's chosen name
Ftfy
By that logic Uranus would be called "George's Star". Then the English nationalists would would get uppity about its name.
The discover generally has input, but when there's a group of experts responsible for maintaining a list of names of things: they decide what's right.
Out of all the examples you could've chosen you went with Uranus.... respect.
Platinium too?
If the entire global science community decided to: yes.
You talk about it like all scientists could ever agree to something and that it would be possible to poll every single one and properly weight their individual scientific relevance.
"pluto isn't a dwarf planet".
Yeah, it is.
The scientific community agrees.
Same thing.
"agrees"
Congratulations, you just found the crazy whiney dissident group of astronomers who just can't admit they're wrong by general consensus.
Experts arguing amongst themselves is hardly the same.
An entire country being contrary just because of national pride and arrogance is completely different.
Disagreeing with general consensus โ wrong
Is it your position that all countries should have the same language regardless of their cultural history?
Also, it isn't rooted in national pride or arrogance. Aluminum came first and was the name given by the first chemist - a British scientist - to isolate the metal. The variant aluminium came from a reviewer who changed the spelling just because he liked the sound better. Aluminum was recognized by ACS 65 years before IUPAC standardized to aluminum. IUPAC has recognized aluminum as an acceptable spelling since 1993. So yeah, the general concensus is the aluminum is okay even based on your logic because IUPAC says so.
OK.
I concede the point. Because the IUPAC says so.
Simple.
I only know that you say it that way because Jonny Ive talked about the design of a laptop more than a decade ago. Frankly, I think you're right.
wow the completely unnecessary xenophobia
edit: we really need a feature to be able to block the people who upvote objectively toxic content like this
wow the completely expected nationalism.
That doesn't even make sense
Americans (generally) can't take criticism from non-Americans.
Some can. Some respond with "yeah we don't do that well" or enjoin the argument with interest and integrity.
Others start screeching about xenophobia.
Stupid foreigners.