Privacy

32112 readers

915 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

219

Is the fairphone really worth it? (feddit.it)

submitted 1 year ago by dontblink@feddit.it to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

156 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The new fairphone 5 came out, it looks cool but the price is really, really high..

If it's a phone that can really last 10 years it could be good, but is that true? Is it worth it? I could get the one with /e/os from Murena because i want a degoogled phone with a bootloader locked, but is it usable on a daily basis?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Regarding the "no good reason to remove it," my understanding was that Samsung opted to remove it to increase the water resistance rating. Unfortunately the fairphone 4 only has an IP54 rating, so that's certainly not the case here.

Apparently they address the headphones jack question in an article on fairphone's support page.

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not arguing with you btw, but the excuses they've provided are all BS. For starters, IP rating isn't really an issue - the Pixel 5a, Galaxy A52, Xperia 5 V, Zenfone 10 - all have a headphone jack, and a minimum of IP65, even going up to IP68 (Pixel 5a), so that really can't be an excuse. Also, cost can't be an excuse either, considering the examples I've provided consists of both budget and premium phones.

The only answer that makes sense here is GREED. Nothing but plain and good ol capitalism at work.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think Air Pods netted Apple more money than Spotify's annual revenue or some shit.

Which is why Samsung gave up after making fun of Apple.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For some time, air pods would have been a top 20 company on their own or something like that.

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Solid agree.

The Galaxy S5 from ~7 years ago was submersible, had a headphone jack, and was pretty damn slim.

Any points made by manufacturers now for 3.5mm removal IMO are just excuses in my eyes. A supply chain issue is the only reason I'll (selfishly) accept.

[–] spaceduck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

S5 also had a removable back cover and battery.