this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
504 points (83.9% liked)

Memes

45309 readers
2346 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cynetri@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Socialism is an economic system defined by production of goods and services according to their need, in contrast to capitalism where they're produced for profit. Two totally different, incompatible systems

[–] ToyDork@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, then I'm willing to admit fault but... Which is it? Worker control of production, or production according to need?

Or are you honestly going to tell me you think Collectivism (worker control of government and economy) or Communism (according to need and with no profit-making allowed) are the only forms that socialism takes?

Not saying you're wrong, only that conflicting definitions do not help your cases, Cynetri and GreenTeaRedFlag.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Worker control of production, or production according to need?

These end up being the same thing, that is sort of the point of capitalism going away. The profit motive is disconnected from human utility.

[–] cynetri@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yea i kinda forgot the workers control part whoops

[–] ToyDork@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, why not just peg the value of 100 of a a currency to the energy used to create a loaf of bread? Then bread will always cost close to 100 and other products will be priced according to energy and not speculation. The recipe would need to be standardized and compared but not automatically equivocated to supermarket/bakery/homemade bread, and changing it once the hypothetical currency is live would not be an option, but you're asking to replace the entire capitalist economy so I can only hope you understand a revolution doesn't come without risk and has never truly succeeded yet for anyone ever.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, why not just peg the value of 100 of a a currency to the energy used to create a loaf of bread? Then bread will always cost close to 100 and other products will be priced according to energy and not speculation.

Markets aren't that efficient compared to planning. There is a reason why firms nowadays work off of a bastardized descendent of Cybersyn.

but you're asking to replace the entire capitalist economy so I can only hope you understand a revolution doesn't come without risk and has never truly succeeded yet for anyone ever.

Tell that to Cubans, who had a longer life expectancy than people than the US even with the blockade before Trump intensified the blockade.

[–] ToyDork@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just said, for anyone. Democracies included. This isn't about who did what, it's about how everyone has failed to create everlasting utopia and I'm sick of people assuming a given political system will ever fix any problem on its own.

[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

That might work. Really it isn't that hard. Most societies through history have practiced some form of social production. Without the fear and lie nation of capitlaism the desire to do good and not live in a bad place has been drive enough to make things work.