this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
608 points (97.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54566 readers
707 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Entropy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

None of them do. It would fuck with people's ability to make mods for them.

[–] Blxter@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

True. I guess I thought that because "ghost wire Tokyo" and "redfall" do. But makes sense for a game like starfield to not

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

redfall

Best copyright protection for Redfall is that the game is shit and nobody wants to play it.

[–] AtomicPurple@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which sucks, because Arkane was one of my favorite developers before the quality of their output fell off over the past five years. I loved the Dishonored games, and Prey is the single best immersive sim ever made. I was looking forward to DeathLoop, but it ended up being kinda meh, and Redfall has been so universally panned that I haven't even bothered to try it.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

I read that most of the people working there were kinda just hoping it would get canceled eventually. The game industry is so normal and fine.

[–] Entropy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah those games are only published by Bethesda, not developed. Their in house games never have DRM, unless you count steam.

[–] wolfshadowheart@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Bethesda is a publisher as well which explains that

Those aren't BGS games. Bethesda that developes =/= bethesda that publishes. The latter likes DRM

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not necessairly (well, goodbye to Starfield Script Extender in that case). But I think it's more that Gamebryo can't integrate Denuvo lol

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would also be unplayably slow. Bethesda games aren't known for performance even without Denuvo slowing them down.

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lets not pretend that there aren't Denuvo games without performance issues...

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless I'm mistaken, Denuvo constantly encrypts and decrypts everything in the process' memory, including executable code, in order to conceal it. There is no way to do that without massive performance overhead.

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are uncracked Denuvo games to this day that don't have performance issues. Not everyone is incompetent in implementing it. That doesn't mean I'm defending it (but Reddit/Lemmy will like to take any sort of non-attack as defense sooooo), I'm just saying that there are Denuvo games that don't suffer performance issues.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now imagine how fast they'd be without Denuvo.

Well we have many games that can be compared. Easiest is when the Steam version still has Denuvo for some reason but there is a GOG version