this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
766 points (96.3% liked)

Memes

45649 readers
2229 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 115 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Wait until you hear about languages where everything is gendered.

We're currently debating, whether BürgerInnen, Bürger:innen or "Bürgerinnen und Bürger" is the proper way to address all citizens. This is not even about anything LGBTQ, it's simply acknowledgement of the concept of non-male people (which is really hard for some conservatives).

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Loudambiance@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Welcome to Good Burger, home of the Good Burger, may I take your order?

[–] BassaForte@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I'm a dude, he's a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes hey!

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

That’ll be five bucks.

[–] Gilles_D@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I prefer the elimination of gender by using the participle because I think it’s easier to read and say, e.g. instead of Student:In you say Studierende (I guess also using the genderless plural of the participle, similar to the English concept). I’m not sure what the equivalent for Bürger would be though. Geborgene?

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not just use the generic plural form (Bürger) as people always have? It has always been used for mixed groups so why shouldnt it continue to? And sometimes it doesnt even work (eg. for "Bauer". The plurals would be "Bauern" and "Bäuerinnen".

[–] Gilles_D@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem people have with the Generischer Maskulinum is, that it is exactly that, the male plural form.

[–] Flumsy@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Grammatical genus is not the same as biological gender. Or do people that are biologically neither male nor female need a third plural form?

[–] Gilles_D@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

That would be another advantage if we had a form that clearly eliminates the gender.

[–] Bene7rddso@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

"Liebe Mitmenschen", meistens ist es nicht nötig, nur diejenigen mit der Staatsbürgerschaft anzusprechen, sondern alle, die in dem Land leben

[–] Interesting_Test_814@jlai.lu 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In French we have a similar problem. Currently the most popular form is "citoyen.ne.s" or "citoyen.nes" (besides the good old "citoyens" or "citoyennes et citoyens"), which sometimes gets rendered as a website by some text displayers (e.g. les habitant.es). It's technically supposed to be a middle dot (citoyen·ne·s) but nobody has that on their keyboard (I literally had to copy-paste it from wikipedia) so people use the point instead. We used to use parentheses like "citoyen(ne)s" but these have vastly be replaced by the dots.

[–] sonnenzeit@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Interesting. In German typography we used to use lower quotation marks at the beginning of a quote and lower quotation marks at the end of a quote, both in handwriting and print:

„Amazing“

But the lower version isn't found on the default QWERTZ keyboard layout so in personal digital communication (instant messages, emails, etc) especially you find double upper ones a lot:

"Amazing" or 'Amazing'

The formal spelling rules haven't been updated and you may still find the lower-upper vision in professional publications where the software adjusts the quotation marks according to a global setting. But most anything that is typed directly by a user will use the lazy lower-lower version.

[–] Hyperi0n@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FYI, hold Alt and the press 0 1 8 3 then release Alt.

[–] Interesting_Test_814@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't work on a phone/tablet

[–] Darxium@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

If it's an Android and using Gboard you can go to the symbol tab and hold - to choose the · symbol.

[–] ComradeR@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Portuguese! Even the f...ing objects are gendered!

[–] DarkenLM@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most things in Portuguese are gendered, yet we sometimes care fuck all about them (e.g: Sandwich is usually feminine, but it can be masculine depending on who you talk to).

Source: I'm Portuguese.

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In brazil sandwich is male and we speak portuguese

[–] TheBestAdmin@social.pluto.lat 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, i forget that we speak brazilian most of the time and spanish on the weekends

[–] ComradeR@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm brazilian too and my sandwich is also male! ♂️

[–] Bene7rddso@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me, a german: Why would they not be gendered? At least you have only 2 genders

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

nO tHeRe ArE iNfInItE gEnDeRs!!!!

[–] krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"mmm this table looks quite feminine to me"

[–] ivenoidea@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Austrian state I used to live in (Niederösterreich) actually just outlawed gendering words like that on any government documents. Absolutely idiotic.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is Bürger not just "citizens"

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Male citizens.