this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
1092 points (97.5% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29056 readers
6 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
lwadmin@lemmy.world
lwCET@lemmy.world
jelloeater85@lemmy.world
Serinus@lemmy.world
lw_mod_notification@lemmy.world
1092
Temporary Changes to our Sign-Up Policy (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by lwadmin@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
111 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Lemmy.world is temporarily disabling open signups and moving to an application-required signup process, due to ongoing issues with malicious bot accounts.

We know this is a major step to take, but we believe that it’s the right one for both us and our community right now.

We’re working on a better long-term technical solution to these bots, but that will take time to create, test, and verify that it doesn’t cause any problems with federation and how our users use our site, and we’d rather make sure we get it right than have a site that’s broken.

We’re making this change on 28 Aug 2023, and don’t have a specific timeline for how long registrations will require an application, but we will post an update once our new anti-abuse measures are in place and working.

Take care, LW Team

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No way would a company risk being caught being responsible for CP. That would cause a massive backlash in the US socially, and the legal troubles would be huge. And the stock market would also very painfully punish them.

[–] 520@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

Do you really think there aren't ways for a company to avoid having their names put against such operations? A simple anonymous darknet transaction is enough to get this done without anyone's name being put on it or CSAM touching corporate machines.