this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
134 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
857 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

AMD denies blocking Bethesda from adding DLSS to Starfield | Starfield DLSS mod locked behind a paywall::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If small devs are expected to support every platform day one that increases the barrier to entry.

A world where small teams start their release on one or two platform they find advantageous and then port their successful titles to other platforms after is probably safest for them and offers the most product diversity for consumers.

[–] whileloop@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not a fan of using the same word to describe two very different kinds of exclusively.

Exclusivity due to platform contracts (i.e., Sony paying a developer to keep a game exclusive to PlayStation), is not the same as exclusivity you described in your comment.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

and then port their successful titles to other platforms

Well, then they're not exclusives, are they? I get the point to speed up time to market, but I'm questioning the benefit of having "lifetime exclusives", or anything beyond 1 year, honestly.