this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
987 points (95.7% liked)

World News

39000 readers
3194 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 154 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Fuck Forbes. They prop up conservatives and conservative talking points. They also post screens of tweets from conservatives, like the dickbag (from this article) who referred to the Ukraine army as "Ukronazis".

The news of this attack is great to hear, but we should not be supporting Forbes with clicks. They are the enemy.

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Forbes is just a blogging platform where "contributors" can post their clickbait. Forbes adds their reputation and the ads and then splits the profit with the "contributor"...

[–] braveone@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

In this case you are wrong. This article is by Forbes Staff, not a contributor.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

we should not be supporting Forbes with clicks.

DeVito gif May I offer you an archive link in these trying times?

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What does that translate to ? some sort of rallying cry

[–] SoaringDE@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

Glory to Ukraine

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tend to agree with you, but I also think it's important to know how the "enemy" thinks and interpret the news. I don't think we should lock ourselves up in echo bubbles only reading stuff we agree with.

[–] Pisodeuorrior@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In theory I'd agree with you. I don't mind reading of nuances or different opinions than mine.

In general however, conservative media are worthless piece of shit embarrassments that I don't want to waste time on.

There's a difference between discussing with sometime with a different opinion, and stopping in the middle of the road responding to every deranged, mentally challenged ignorant mean crack addict who yells their vision of the world from the top of a soap box.

[–] figaro@lemdro.id 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed. They don't argue in good faith. Their goal is not honesty and truth. What's the point in engaging with someone like that?

[–] bobman@unilem.org 4 points 1 year ago

Arguing in good faith is the important part.

As soon as I engage with someone not arguing in good faith, I leave. There's just no point.

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Comparing Forbes to a deranged, mentally challenged crack addict isn't very fair, whatever your opinion is on Forbes or crack addicts.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, at least crack addicts have an excuse

[–] 30isthenew29@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except for the tweet, how is this article not just bringing the news? I don’t get it.

[–] MajorJimmy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Believe it or not, Forbes has written more than a single article.

[–] heef@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I agree with the referencing a horrible twitter user in the article being a bad thing, but your stance on conservatives, especially your username, is very fascist in of itself.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Intolerance of intolerance is essential to a free society. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[–] Impassionata@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

is very fascist in of itself.

No. It's not fascist to have a firm and authoritative opinion. It is, perhaps, violent and authoritarian in outlook, but conservatives have just tolerated if not endorsed an insurrection under false pretenses and those conservatives have yet to kill the traitor responsible for it, so contemplation of violence is justified because this 'cold civil war' as Vivek called it is not going to end with that boomer criminal in power ever again.