this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
886 points (80.5% liked)

Memes

45725 readers
1023 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There will always be a distribution of wealth. The key thing is how broad that distribution is.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, there's no problem with a meritocracy as long as the top and the bottom of the gradient aren't (literally can't pay bills -> more money than you could ever spend.)

Like in no sane world would people willingly become surgeons for the same pay as a sanitation worker, that's just fucking stupid. Why spend a decade going through school to be a doctor when you could just go pick up trash and make the same money? We have to have some kind of variation in pay scale or society wouldnt function.

Like you said, how much difference between the top and the bottom definitely doesn't have to be what it is.

[–] benjiman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Assuming that the education could be free, why wouldn't you expect people to train as surgeons?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I currently make more money than the average surgeon does in the UK, and it isn't close. Top end is like 130k for them.

People will still be doctors if you cut the pay doctors get, because they are, elsewhere, right now.