this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
652 points (96.4% liked)

Asklemmy

44173 readers
1777 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google stock is literally worthless and does not represent an actual stake in the company for example

[–] Chapo0114@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Autisticky@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Google's shares are divided into two types, Class A and Class C. Class A shares, traded as GOOGL, confer one vote per share as a typical stock would. Class C shares, traded as GOOG, confers no voting privileges. This dual shares system was done to raise more money selling less useful Class C shares (intended for mutual funds and the like) while keeping control of the company in the hands of those held on to Class A shares (i.e. longtime executives).

[–] Chapo0114@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, thanks for the info. That's actually what I suspect is happening with the new fractional shares thing, but the brokerage is the one retaining control.

[–] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's worse than that, because a company bylaw also gives every GOOG stock a set value of a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a cent and a binding part of their issuance is the clause that they can demand to buy them back for that price at any time. Google can drop like pocket lint and instantly buy all GOOG stock back.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This type of thing might be more common than just the famous Google example - apparently lots of valuations reported in media just assume that all shares in a company are equal (fungible, interchangeable) and the actual valuation might be a lot different if it was calculated properly.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They have 2 (3?) types of shares, and the one most people buy ($GOOG) is a class C share which comes with no voting rights and doesn’t give you a share of the company profits.

While class A shares ($GOOGL) come with voting rights, class B shares which are held by Google’s founders and insiders get 10x voting power and so they still hold the majority vote. Class A also does not pay dividends.