this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
786 points (100.0% liked)

196

16531 readers
2190 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
786
Science-Fiction Rule (lemmy.tf)
submitted 1 year ago by BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gullible@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Did anything ever come of that? It was terrifying.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I never heard about it again after that, but I also didn’t go specifically looking, either.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 9 points 1 year ago

I think I recall reading that some people were held and then let go. Kind of anticlimactic, but I think it was also grounds for lawsuits in some cases.

[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

Actually yes:

Tucked inside the National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 6395), which just became law, is a new requirement for federal military and civilian law enforcement personnel involved in the federal government’s response to a “civil disturbance” to wear visible identification of themselves and the name of the government entity employing them.

https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/new-law-requires-federal-agents-to-identify-themselves-to-protesters

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Probably not, oh well